Law has no stipulated boundaries, it develops with the developing society. Law in India is dynamic, it goes through rigorous scrutiny every day and has developed in its due course after Independence. As Law is taking a steep turn due to quick societal development. We at the Policy Observer, wish to explain the nuances of the law in a comprehensible manner to every citizen of the nation.
Featured
Editor’s Choice
The division of the city was done into 32 zones and licenses were based on the same. In June 2021, the tenders were issued for the application of L-7Z and L-7V licenses. The office of commission of the excise government of the national capital issued terms and conditions for the grant of licenses.
A law prescribing the procedure for depriving a person of his ‘personal liberty has to meet the requirements of Article 19 and if not shall be struck down as arbitrary under Article 14. Liberties and restrictions should run parallel to each other. One overpowering the other would distort the fair working of the constitutional machinery.
Posts-:
The division of the city was done into 32 zones and licenses were based on the same. In June 2021, the tenders were issued for the application of L-7Z and L-7V licenses. The office of commission of the excise government of the national capital issued terms and conditions for the grant of licenses.
A law prescribing the procedure for depriving a person of his ‘personal liberty has to meet the requirements of Article 19 and if not shall be struck down as arbitrary under Article 14. Liberties and restrictions should run parallel to each other. One overpowering the other would distort the fair working of the constitutional machinery.
The office of the Governor is slowly and steadily being converted into an extended political branch of the central government. The scale and scope this time around are more than ever before! Are we ready for the implications this will have on National Unity and the dent it will cause to the constitutional principles of Cooperative Federalism, Constitutional Morality, and Democracy?
Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud while overruling ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla said that:
“When histories of nations are written and critiqued, there are judicial decisions at the forefront of liberty. Yet others have to be assigned to the archives, reflective of what was, but should never have been.”
“We are constrained to express, that it seems, that in its anxiety to suppress dissent, in the mind of the State, the line between the constitutionally guaranteed right to protest and terrorist activity seems to be getting somewhat blurred. If this mindset gains traction, it would be a sad day for democracy.”
These guidelines have been placed to deal with the rapidly changing dimension of transmission of information through internet platforms. Stakeholders condemned these guidelines on various accounts. However, the plain reading of these guidelines reflects some drafting errors that are causing inconsistency with the common-law principles
Is the NHRC the latest victim of Executive overreach?
Recently the controversial appointment of the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission made headlines.
it is the author who is empowered to institute appropriate legal proceedings civil or criminal as the case may be, but if the author has availed the services of the collective management organization the same can be done by the copyright society.
From Gaya Lal to Jyotiraditya Scindia, nothing has changed except a law was enacted in the year 1985, which has been constantly violated by every party in power. A law with loopholes has made it easy for parties with huge cash reserves to reverse democratic mandate.
So, the question arises: did the GOI intend to inflict great suffering or serious injury by the means of a ‘widespread and systematic attack’ directed against a civilian population.’ Which was ‘in pursuant to a State or organizational policy to commit such attack’?
Citizens assert their voice to elect leaders whose policies and priorities match with them the most. After, being elected, members often “cross the floor” and cause political instability, often tempted by the rival parties with huge “sign-on bonuses” or plump ministerial posts.
Once the legendary Tej Bahadur Sapru was arguing before Sir Shah Mohammed Sulaiman, who was known in the Bar as a “talking judge”.
The Pandemic has shown us that by failing to even provide conditional bail to women on remand, the criminal justice system is associated with a gut-wrenching kind of brutality.