Law-Editors Choice

The best posts of this section, chosen by our editors.

Featured

Privatization of Liquor: A Look Into the Loopholes of The Policy

The division of the city was done into 32 zones and licenses were based on the same. In June 2021, the tenders were issued for the application of L-7Z and L-7V licenses. The office of commission of the excise government of the national capital issued terms and conditions for the grant of licenses.

Supreme Court: A populist institution?

Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud while overruling ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla said that:
“When histories of nations are written and critiqued, there are judicial decisions at the forefront of liberty. Yet others have to be assigned to the archives, reflective of what was, but should never have been.”

Editor’s Choice

Supreme Court: A populist institution?

Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud while overruling ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla said that:
“When histories of nations are written and critiqued, there are judicial decisions at the forefront of liberty. Yet others have to be assigned to the archives, reflective of what was, but should never have been.”

read more

Posts-:

Privatization of Liquor: A Look Into the Loopholes of The Policy

Privatization of Liquor: A Look Into the Loopholes of The Policy

The division of the city was done into 32 zones and licenses were based on the same. In June 2021, the tenders were issued for the application of L-7Z and L-7V licenses. The office of commission of the excise government of the national capital issued terms and conditions for the grant of licenses.

Supreme Court: A populist institution?

Supreme Court: A populist institution?

Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud while overruling ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla said that:
“When histories of nations are written and critiqued, there are judicial decisions at the forefront of liberty. Yet others have to be assigned to the archives, reflective of what was, but should never have been.”

Strengthening the Democracy

Strengthening the Democracy

“We are constrained to express, that it seems, that in its anxiety to suppress dissent, in the mind of the State, the line between the constitutionally guaranteed right to protest and terrorist activity seems to be getting somewhat blurred. If this mindset gains traction, it would be a sad day for democracy.”

Dissent in a political party equals defection?

Dissent in a political party equals defection?

From Gaya Lal to Jyotiraditya Scindia, nothing has changed except a law was enacted in the year 1985, which has been constantly violated by every party in power. A law with loopholes has made it easy for parties with huge cash reserves to reverse democratic mandate.